The perfect primary is lining up for the republican party and it will be the ultimate poll as to where the majority of its constituents are currently positioned on an issue that seems to be fracturing the party. Is the republican party dominated by the isolationist wing, represented by JD Vance? Or alternatively, by what should be seen as the Donald Trump wing which believes in limited and surgical overseas operations which promote America's interest and world peace. This is represented by Marco Rubio as demonstrated by his orchestration of the Venezuela operation.
It seems that many Americans are rightly scarred by endless middle east wars and nation building which has been bad policy for the last few decades and pushed by the so called Neocons., This culminated in Biden's botched Afghanistan pull out which was the last straw highlighting this disastrous foreign policy leading to isolationist leanings. The pendulum has swung to other extreme where some feel any foreign involvement, including foreign aid, is viewed as contrary to the American first dogma and is filled with conspiracy nonsense. The ideal course for America's foreign policy likely lies somewhere between these two extremes.
Based on his actions over the past year, President Trump seems to be following this middle, more rational and thought out course. Minimal risk with significant upside, surgical pinpoint operations, and carefully picking your moments to intervene. Give financial aid those groups that will promote US interests at the expense of their soldiers and weaponry, not America's. The more successes this Trump foreign policy racks up, the more likely GOP voters will support the Trump/Rubio approach and shake off the urge for isolationism.
It is clear that Marcio Rubio, as Secretary of State, aligns himself with the Trump policies as he is instrumental in their conception and implementation. Conversely, Vance is being somewhat vague about where he positions himself in relation to isolationism, foreign aid, and America's foreign policy. Not unexpected, as he does not want to alienate voters too early, and wants to be the loyal VP, supporting his boss' policies. But if/when he becomes a presidential candidate he owes it to GOP voters to clearly lay out his positions so a healthy debate can ensue.
Although this debate is splintering the party, it is an important one which is critical to the platform of the GOP so voters clearly understand its positions. Is the isolationist wing just a vocal minority with a small sliver of the party amplified by the Carlsons of the podcast world with pumped up subscriber numbers? Or hopefully, is there a silent majority which want to continue with the more reasoned approach as practiced by the Trump administration and bequeathed to Rubio? The Republican primary between Vance and Rubio will be the ultimate poll.
No comments:
Post a Comment